{"id":4406,"date":"2011-01-12T06:29:48","date_gmt":"2011-01-12T04:29:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.ultimatefatburner.com\/?p=4406"},"modified":"2015-12-03T11:14:58","modified_gmt":"2015-12-03T16:14:58","slug":"love-smell-plagiarism-morning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/love-smell-plagiarism-morning\/","title":{"rendered":"I Love the Smell of Plagiarism in the Morning!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Update (1\/13\/10):<\/strong> I have been assured by someone close to the company that the documents in question will be removed from public view.<\/p>\n<p>I was doing some digging today on maqui &#8211; the latest and greatest &#8220;superfruit,&#8221; doncha know. Lots of people are searching for info, so Paul tagged me to write a review. As an aside, I should\u00a0have it done in another day or so.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s not the point of this post&#8230; it&#8217;s just the background.<\/p>\n<p>In the course of my research, I naturally scanned various sales sites. Basically, I determined that the marketing is &#8220;Acai 2.0&#8243;&#8230; except\u00a0companies are claiming that maqui\u00a0is &#8220;better&#8221; than acai\u00a0because it has a higher ORAC score.<\/p>\n<p>As Kurt Vonnegut used to say, &#8220;so it goes.&#8221; Problem is, the\u00a0whole\u00a0notion of &#8220;high ORAC = good\/higher ORAC = better&#8221; is far too simplistic.\u00a0As I wrote back in 2008, &#8220;ORAC values are not yet tied to clinical outcomes.&#8221;\u00a0 I was pretty sure that this was still true, but decided to\u00a0consult &#8220;The Great Gazoogle&#8221; to be sure before I\u00a0put it\u00a0in my review.<\/p>\n<p>To begin, I Googled &#8220;ORAC and clinical outcomes&#8221; &#8211; which, unsurprisingly, pulled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/supplement-ad-claim-of-the-month-high-orac\/\" target=\"_blank\">my own 2008 post on ORAC<\/a> up. But it also pulled up another page link, just above the one to my post, with the same &#8220;ORAC values are not yet tied to clinical outcomes<em>&#8230;<\/em>&#8221; phrase highlighted. Curious to see\u00a0my precise wording\u00a0mirrored on\u00a0<em>a different\u00a0web site<\/em>, I clicked the link to &#8220;ORAC, a Controversial Value.&#8221;\u00a0The resulting doc\u00a0turned out to be a pdf\u00a0emblazoned with the logo of\u00a0an MLM (multi-level marketing)\u00a0company: &#8220;eXfuze.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And there was a\u00a0LOT more than just one phrase from my post in that doc!<\/p>\n<p>Grrrr&#8230;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Here are\u00a0a few examples of\u00a0the content\u00a0duped\u00a0from my ORAC post:<\/p>\n<p>Me:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To begin with,\u00a0ORAC stands for \u201cOxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity.\u201d\u00a0 It\u2019s\u00a0a \u201ctest tube\u201d (in-vitro) analysis that was developed by the USDA, and is a standard\u00a0assay for measuring the antioxidant capacity of a food source.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20110926043501\/http:\/\/brunswicklabs.com:80\/principles.shtml\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The ORAC test uses a fluorescent probe\u00a0that can be\u00a0damaged by free radicals<\/a>.\u00a0 The change in fluorescence intensity is a measure of the amount of the damage.\u00a0 The\u00a0effectiveness of\u00a0an antioxidant is reflected by the protection it offers against that change.\u00a0 The results are compared to a standard \u2013 usually \u201cTrolox\u201d (a form of water soluble vitamin E) and expressed in terms of \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biotek.com\/products\/?id=161\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trolox equivalents<\/a>.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>eXfuze doc:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>ORAC stands for &#8220;Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity.&#8221; It&#8217;s a &#8220;test tube&#8221; (in-vitro) chemical analysis that was developed by the USDA. The ORAC test has become a standard assay for measuring the antioxidant capacity of a given food source. The ORAC test uses a fluorescent probe that can be damaged by free radicals. The change in fluoresence intensity is a measure of the amount of the damage. The effectiveness of an antioxidant is reflected by the protection it offers against that change. The results are compared to a standard usually &#8220;Trolox&#8221; (a form of water soluble vitamin E known with the name of Trolox) and expressed in terms of &#8220;Trolox equivalents.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are a\u00a0few little changes, here and there, but the\u00a0&#8220;borrowing&#8221; is unmistakable.<\/p>\n<p>Me:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There are, needless to state,\u00a0other types\u00a0of free radicals, and it\u2019s entirely possible for an antioxidant that is extremely effective against\u00a0non-peroxyl radicals to have a low ORAC score.\u00a0 Carotenoids are an excellent example.\u00a0 Carotenoids such as beta-carotene are <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.acs.org\/action\/cookieAbsent\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">highly effective at quenching singlet oxygen radicals<\/a>, yet <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/publications\/publications.htm?seq_no_115=196616\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">perform poorly against peroxyl radicals<\/a>.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/alpha-lipoic-acid.html\" target=\"_blank\">Alpha-lipoic acid<\/a> is another excellent <a href=\"http:\/\/online.liebertpub.com\/action\/cookieAbsent\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">antioxidant that has a low ORAC value<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>eXfuze doc:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Another important point to consider is the fact that it is entirely possible for an antioxidant that is extremely effective against non-peroxyl radicals to have a low ORAC score. An example of this is carotenoids, natural substances responsible for the color in foods. Carotenoids such as beta-carotene are highly effective at quenching singlet oxygen radicals, yet perform poorly against peroxyl free radicals. Alpha lipoic acid is another excellent example of an antioxidant that has a low ORAC value and yet in our human body performs as a great antioxidant.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Me:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A high\u00a0ORAC score\u00a0can be misleading, as\u00a0antioxidants\u00a0with\u00a0lower scores may still have health effects specific to particular organs or tissues.\u00a0\u00a0For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.macular.org\/good-food\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin are useful for\u00a0preventing age-related macular degeneration<\/a>\u00a0(AMD), \u00a0yet spinach, which is an excellent source of these compounds, has an <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20120113064415\/http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/SP2UserFiles\/Place\/12354500\/Data\/ORAC\/ORAC07.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ORAC value<\/a> of \u201conly\u201d 1515 (100g, raw), whereas\u00a0an equivalent amount\u00a0of raw blueberries come in at 6552.\u00a0\u00a0Thus,\u00a0when it comes to maintaining health\/preventing disease,\u00a0the\u00a0highest scoring foods aren\u2019t necessarily the best ones.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>eXfuze doc:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A high ORAC score can be a misleading value, as antioxidants with lower scores may still have health effects specific to particular organs or tissues. For example, the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin are useful for preventing age-related macular degeneration (AMD), yet spinach, which is an excellent source of these compounds, has an ORAC value of &#8220;only&#8221; 1515 (100g, raw), whereas an equivalent amount of raw blueberries come in at 6552. Thus, when it comes to maintaining health and preventing disease, the highest scoring foods aren&#8217;t necessarily the best ones.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s more&#8230; but I shan&#8217;t bore you with ALL the side-by-side comparisons. I think y&#8217;all get the point.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;re talking serious FAIL, here, folks. I don&#8217;t know who at the company is responsible for this, but I&#8217;d like to find out!<\/p>\n<p>But in the meantime&#8230;\u00a0who am I to hold a grudge&#8230; especially when eXfuze is in the\u00a0&#8220;opportunity&#8221; business?\u00a0And whaddya know:\u00a0I sense a <em>real\u00a0opportunity<\/em> here!\u00a0After all,\u00a0eXfuze\u00a0markets supplement drinks&#8230; and <em><strong>I<\/strong><\/em> write supplement reviews.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a match made in heaven, people! Stay tuned&#8230; \ud83d\ude00<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Update (1\/13\/10): I have been assured by someone close to the company that the documents in question will be removed from public view. I was doing some digging [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28],"tags":[1860],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4406"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4406"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4406\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10206,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4406\/revisions\/10206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}