{"id":433,"date":"2008-11-21T22:44:26","date_gmt":"2008-11-21T20:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.ultimatefatburner.com\/?p=433"},"modified":"2015-12-03T11:16:22","modified_gmt":"2015-12-03T16:16:22","slug":"questioning-claims-part-i-some-personal-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/questioning-claims-part-i-some-personal-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Questioning Claims, Part I: Some Personal History"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I think I was 22 or 23, when my husband brought home a used book that changed my life.  The book was &#8220;Science: Good, Bad and Bogus&#8221; by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Martin_Gardner\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Martin Gardner<\/a>. A few people might recognize the name&#8230;he wrote the well-known &#8220;Mathematical Games&#8221; column that ran in Scientific American for 25 years.  Gardner wrote a lot more than that, however: he was also a prolific science writer who specialized in exposing pseudoscience, frauds, and hoaxes. The book itself was an anthology: a collection of articles and book reviews printed elsewhere over the years &#8211; but each one was new to me.  And &#8211; needless to state &#8211; it was an entertaining and fascinating read&#8230;because &#8211; at its heart &#8211; the primary theme was something I&#8217;d never really given a lot of thought to before&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Namely, that people &#8211; even those who present themselves as &#8220;authorities&#8221; &#8211; can (and do) lie, spin, make s**t up, see things that aren&#8217;t there, take leaps of faith or imagination; or can be deluded, tricked or just flat-out wrong. While Gardner&#8217;s targets were purveyors of paranormal claims, it was obvious that the BS wasn&#8217;t confined to that particular niche.  I ended up reading additional books in the &#8220;skeptical&#8221; genre, such as James Randi&#8217;s &#8220;Flim Flam,&#8221; Phillip Kitcher&#8217;s &#8220;Abusing Science,&#8221; Richard DeMille&#8217;s &#8220;The Don Juan Papers,&#8221; and many more besides&#8230;my reading list spanned a range from science to current events, and even history.<\/p>\n<p>These authors, and many others, taught me how to ask the question: &#8220;Is it true?&#8221;  They helped me to view seemingly plausible arguments with a critical eye, and not be misled by my own assumptions.  I learned how to deconstruct false logic and put claims to the test.  What they taught me &#8211; in essence &#8211; was how to apply the scientific method, to solve practical, everyday problems.<\/p>\n<p>I already understood the scientific method in the abstract, of course.  At the time, I was working on my undergraduate and graduate degrees in Food Science.  I had always been interested &#8211; fascinated, really &#8211; by nutrition, but balked at actually getting a degree in it.  I already knew what I felt I needed to know (and could easily find out more if I wanted to)&#8230;but what I didn&#8217;t know was how everything I saw in the grocery store came to be.  Food Science (food technology, really) provided far more information on why the world works the way it does &#8211; so even though I never ended up working for General Mills or Pillsbury like my fellow graduates &#8211; it was the best investment of time and energy that I ever made.<\/p>\n<p>What I do here, is &#8211; in a very real sense &#8211; a convergence of the two&#8230;UltimateFatBurner.com is a place where I can use the research skills and knowledge my professors and university mentors taught me, as well as the ones I learned from Gardner, Randi, Kitcher, DeMille and so many others.  I&#8217;d originally viewed my &#8220;skeptical&#8221; reading as just a hobby &#8211; but I realized how important it was after overhearing a conversation&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>I was in the &#8220;Natural Food Works&#8221; &#8211; a local health food store in Davis, CA &#8211; to pick up some whole wheat flour and a few other groceries.  There was only one clerk in the store, so I had to cool my heels while she waited on another customer: an older, middle aged woman.  The woman asked her where she could find 1,000 mg Vitamin C tablets &#8211; so the clerk led her over to a shelf and selected a brand.  Evidently the price was higher than the woman expected, so she asked the clerk why it was so much more expensive than what she could buy in a conventional drug store (like Walgreens).<\/p>\n<p>The clerk replied that the cheap Vitamin C was synthetic and produced from coal tar; while the high-priced version in her hand was &#8220;natural&#8221; and &#8220;made from corn.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mentally, I had a &#8220;WTF!!!???&#8221; moment, as I knew this couldn&#8217;t possibly be right.  Vitamin C has a carbohydrate-like structure &#8211; no need to use benzene or pyridine for source material.  Likewise, the mental picture the clerk invoked of Vitamin C being extracted from corn, made no sense either.  Even foods that are &#8220;rich&#8221; sources of particular vitamins, don&#8217;t contain very much of them on a weight basis&#8230;to try and extract them from natural sources would be cumbersome, expensive, and would generate a vast amount of waste material.<\/p>\n<p>But I didn&#8217;t know exactly how commercial Vitamin C was made, so I didn&#8217;t say anything&#8230;but after making my purchase, I headed straight for the library to figure it out.  I found my answer right away, in the Merck Index.  Turned out commercial Vitamin C was synthesized from glucose.<\/p>\n<p>Then I started to laugh, as the whole &#8220;Vitamin C from corn&#8221; bit fell into place.  Corn is a source of cornstarch&#8230;which is nothing more than a glucose polymer.  You can break it down enzymatically into corn syrup &#8211; which is just liquid glucose.  Then you can chemically convert the glucose to ascorbic acid using a combination of &#8220;natural&#8221; fermentatative and minor chemical steps.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the &#8220;natural,&#8221; expensive, health food store Vitamin C was exactly the same stuff you could get at Walgreens.  The health food version was &#8211; in fact &#8211; a rip off.<\/p>\n<p>Was the clerk lying?  Nope&#8230;or at least I don&#8217;t think she was.  The whole &#8220;synthetic vitamins from coal tar&#8221; meme is still firmly entrenched &#8211; even now, over 25 years later, despite the fact that biotechnology rulz (feel free to &#8220;Google&#8221; it, if you don&#8217;t believe me).  But she was a &#8220;true believer&#8221; who didn&#8217;t question what she was told, because her information came from &#8220;the good guys&#8221; who are interested in our health&#8230;not &#8220;the bad guys&#8221; who are only interested in profits.<\/p>\n<p>At that point, I was pretty much a committed &#8220;sprout head&#8221; &#8211; very much into &#8220;natural&#8221; foods and supplements&#8230;and in many ways, I still am.  But experiences like the above made me realize that so much of the &#8220;information&#8221; on health and nutrition out there &#8211; however well-intentioned &#8211; is often misleading, if not flat-out wrong.  Just like in Martin Gardner&#8217;s world, pseudoscience masquerades as real science, and many can&#8217;t tell the difference.  It&#8217;s not necessarily &#8220;bad&#8221; or &#8220;harmful&#8221; in a direct sense &#8211; sometimes good advice is given, even if it&#8217;s based on demonstrably false information.  It is, however, harmful in an indirect sense, as it cuts off critical thinking&#8230;and can take a lot of money out of your pocket, if you&#8217;re not careful (just like the woman in the health food store, who ended up paying a good $15.00 more than she had to for that Vitamin C).<\/p>\n<p>So this is why I do what I do&#8230;which I suspect may be a little frustrating to some readers, who don&#8217;t see the world in quite the same way that I do.  Hopefully, this series of posts will shed a little more light.<\/p>\n<p>To be continued&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think I was 22 or 23, when my husband brought home a used book that changed my life. The book was &#8220;Science: Good, Bad and Bogus&#8221; by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3,15,28],"tags":[1846,1857,1349,1591],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=433"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10227,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433\/revisions\/10227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ultimatefatburner.com\/ufb-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}